Manual Society of Hunters: Re-Integration

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Society of Hunters: Re-Integration file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Society of Hunters: Re-Integration book. Happy reading Society of Hunters: Re-Integration Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Society of Hunters: Re-Integration at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Society of Hunters: Re-Integration Pocket Guide.

An irony of modern life is that, in spite of spectacular increases in material abundance and centuries of technological progress, hunter-gatherers, people who have lived with almost no material possessions, have enjoyed lives in many ways as satisfying and rewarding as lives led in the industrial North. Many hunter-gatherer societies have been affluent in the sense of having everything they needed.

They spent their leisure time eating, drinking, playing, and socializing - in short, doing the very things associated with affluence. Many hunter-gatherer societies have also enjoyed a great amount of personal freedom. Among the! Kung, and the Hadza of Tanzania, for example, there were either no leaders at all, or temporary leaders whose authority was severely constrained. These societies had no social classes and arguably no discrimination based on gender. Their ways of living and ways of collective decision-making allowed them to survive and thrive for tens of thousands of years in equilibrium with their environment, without destroying the resources upon which their economies were based.

The more we learn about hunter-gatherers, the more we realize that the cultural beliefs surrounding modern market capitalism do not reflect universal "human nature. The dominant school of economic theory in the industrialized world, neoclassical economics, holds these attributes to be essential for economic advancement and affluence. It is true that hunter-gatherer societies show a wide variety of patterns of culture, some less egalitarian and some less "affluent" in Sahlins' use of the term. Yet the very existence of societies living adequately, even happily, with no industry, no agriculture, and few material possessions offers a challenge to the concept of human nature held by most economists.

Economics is defined in most textbooks as "the study of the allocation of scarce resources among alternative ends. We cannot have everything we want, so we must choose what we would have. Every act of consumption is thus also an act of denial. The more we consume, the more we are deprived.

In this dismal state of affairs, our job as economic beings is to allocate our limited incomes so as to get the greatest enjoyment possible from the relatively few things we are able to buy. The cultural beliefs supporting industrial capitalism serve to justify the peculiar relationship which has recently evolved among humans, and between humans and the rest of the world. Central to this belief system is the notion of "economic man.

Today those of us in the industrial North hardly recognize the idea of economic man as a cultural belief, as opposed to a universal fact, because it accurately describes most of us. We ration our time from an early age to get the training we need to earn an income; we carefully allocate this income among the dizzying array of goods and services available in the marketplace. We may joke about the irrationality of our species but we all believe deep down that we personally are fairly rational and consistent in the choices we make. We believe that to want more and more things is a natural human attribute.

We value the individual above society. Competition and expansion, not cooperation and stability, describe the rules by which our economic world operates. We are all now economic persons. We have limited resources incomes and a very long list of things we would like to have. Neoclassical economic theory contains more than a set of beliefs about human nature. It is also an ideology justifying the existing economic organization, resource use, and distribution of wealth Gowdy and O'Hara This belief system sees class divisions as inevitable and sees nature as a collection of "natural resources" to be used to fuel the engine of economic growth and technological progress.

The inequality of the distribution of goods among individuals in a capitalist economy is justified according to the "marginal productivity theory of distribution. Those who add more to the total economic product of society should receive a greater share than those who add a smaller amount. Economists argue further that competition guarantees the outcome that wages are equal to the value of the marginal product of labor. The ideological implication of marginal productivity theory is that in a competitive economy all workers tend to be paid what they deserve. In the neoclassical economic theory of market exchange, the historical and social circumstances that enable one person to produce more than another are not considered.

Inherited wealth, for example, gives a person access to more capital, and so his or her marginal product will generally be higher than that of a person born into less privileged circumstances. In general, a person with more education - again, usually because of family circumstances - will have a higher marginal product and thus a higher income than one who is less educated. Neoclassical theory sees individuals as isolated producers and isolated consumers of market goods, competing with one another for scarce resources. One's value as an individual is largely a function of economic success, of accumulating and consuming more wealth than does one's neighbor.

The view of human nature embedded in neoclassical economic theory is an anomaly among human cultures. In fact, the basic organizing principle of our market economy - that humans are driven by greed and the promise that more is always better than less - is only one way of approaching the economic problem of how to make a living. Many cultures have very different ways of organizing production and distribution.

Among the Hadza, for example, there are elaborate rules to ensure that all meat is equally shared. Hoarding, or even having a greater share than others, is socially unacceptable. Apart from personal items, such as tools, weapons, or smoking pipes, there are sanctions against accumulating possessions.

Furthermore, because of the constant mobility of hunter-gatherers, possessions are a nuisance. According to Woodburn , among the! Kung and Hadza, hoarding food when another person is hungry would be unthinkable. The hunter-gatherer represents "uneconomic man" Sahlins Hunter-gatherers give us an opportunity to glimpse human nature in a much different form, before it was guided by market relationships and modern ideas of individualism.

There may be socially constructed limits within the present framework of our industrial economy to cooperating, reducing consumption, and in general living sustainably; but knowing that for almost all of human history these limits did not exist, it is impossible to conclude that there is something "natural" about them. The mere existence, and in particular the success, of hunter-gatherer societies proves that there are many highly successful ways of organizing production and distribution other than through competitive markets. The most important challenges to economic orthodoxy that come from the descriptions of life in hunter-gatherer societies are that 1 the economic notion of scarcity is a social construct, not an inherent property of human existence, 2 the separation of work from social life is not a necessary characteristic of economic production, 3 the linking of individual well-being to individual production is not a necessary characteristic of economic organization, 4 selfishness and acquisitiveness are aspects of human nature, but not necessarily the dominant ones, and 5 inequality based on class and gender is not a necessary characteristic of human society.

Scarcity The notion of scarcity is largely a social construct, not a necessary characteristic of human existence or human nature. Hunter-gatherers may be considered affluent because they achieve a balance between means and ends by having everything they need and wanting little more. Asked why he did not plant crops a! Kung man replied: "Why should we plant when there are so many mongongo nuts in the world? As a JuPhoansi song goes, "Those who work for a living, that's their problem!

Hunter-gatherers have few material possessions but much leisure time and, arguably, a richer social life than the "affluent" of the industrialized North. In contrast to many hunter-gatherer economies, the modern industrial system generates scarcity by creating unlimited wants. Consumers are addicted to a continual flow of consumer goods and feel continually deprived because addiction can never be satiated. In Sahlins' words: "Consumption is a double tragedy: what begins in inadequacy will end in deprivation:' The modern world-wide addiction to material wealth threatens our psychological well-being as well as the biological and geophysical foundations of our economic system.

Productive activity A second fact about hunter-gatherer life is that work is social and cooperative. Typically, "immediate return" hunter-gatherers Barnard and Woodburn , Testart , Woodburn , those with the simplest technology such as the Hadza and! Kung, spend only three or four hours per day occupied with what we would call economic activities. These activities include hunting a large number of animal species and gathering a large variety of plant material. Successful production depends on detailed knowledge about the characteristics and life histories of the plant and animal species upon which they depend for survival, not on capital equipment.

Hunting and gathering is integrated with rituals, socialization, and artistic expression. The idea that earning a living is drudgery whose only purpose is to make it possible for us to live our "real" lives is not present in hunter-gatherer cultures. Distribution A third fact about hunter-gatherer economies also runs counter to the notion of economic man central to modern economic theory: no necessary connection exists between production by individuals and distribution to individuals. Economists argue that sharing has an economically rational basis Frank The person we share our catch with today may feed us tomorrow when our luck or skill fails.

In this view, sharing is a kind of insurance policy that rationally spreads the risk of not having anything to eat. Sharing in hunter-gatherer cultures, however, is much more profound than this. In many cultures at least, there is no connection between who produces and who receives the economic output. According to Woodburn , for example, some members of the Hadza do virtually no work their entire lives. Many Hadza men gamble with spear points, and many are reluctant to hunt for fear of damaging their gambling "chips," yet these men continue to get their full share of the game animals killed.

Although "freeloading" is always a potential problem in all cultures, disdain for those not engaged in productive activity is evidently a culturally specific emotion. Great care must be taken that the distribution is done exactly right. Lee writes:"Distribution is done with great care, according to a set of rules, arranging and rearranging the pieces for up to an hour so that each recipient will get the right proportion. Successful distributions are remembered with pleasure for weeks afterwards, while improper meat distributions can be the cause of bitter wrangling among close relatives.

Ownership and capital Accounts by early European explorers and anthropologists indicate that sharing and a lack of concern with ownership of personal possessions are common characteristics of hunter-gatherers. Among the Hadza, the lack of private ownership of things also applies to the ownership of resources Woodburn Attempts to characterize the relationship of some hunter-gatherers to the land as "ownership" may be a case of imposing Western concepts on people who have very different beliefs about the relationships between people and between humans and nature.

Riches argues that the term "ownership" should be used only in cases where people are observed denying others the right to use particular resources. The mere act of asking permission may only be a social convention expressing friendly intent and may not be an indication of "legal" control over a resource. Many immediate return hunter-gatherers depend only, on their bodies and intelligence to produce their daily sustenance.

Mobility is paramount and physical capital is necessarily simple. Capital in a hunter-gatherer world is not a physical thing that can be manipulated and controlled, but rather knowledge that is shared and accessible to all see the discussion in Veblen With this knowledge, hunter-gatherers can quickly construct their material culture. Turnbull writes of Pygmies of central Africa: "The materials for the making of shelter, clothing, and all other necessary items of material culture are all at hand at a moment's notice.

Furthermore, the lack of preoccupation with acquiring material goods gives hunter-gatherers the freedom to enjoy life. Most of the lives of hunter-gatherers are not spent at a workplace away from friends and family but in talking, resting, sharing, and celebrating; in short, in being human. This is an ideal of Modern Western society, expressed in the major religions and in popular culture, but it is largely unrealized. Inequality Finally, inequality is not a natural feature of human societies. Immediate-return hunter-gatherer societies were "aggressively egalitarian" Woodburn These societies worked because of, not in spite of, the fact that power and authority were kept in check.

Inequality as a result of human nature is another side of the cultural myth of economic man. The logic of economic rationality justifies as inevitable income differences based on class, race, or gender. Sometimes this justification is overt but usually and more insidiously it acts through appeals to economic efficiency.

A trade-off between economic growth and equity is a feature of most introductory textbooks. If our society errs on the side of too much equity so the story goes the incentive to work is lost, production falls, and even the temporary beneficiaries of more income equality end up worse off than before. The hunter-gatherer literature shows that "economic rationality" is peculiar to market capitalism and is an embedded set of cultural beliefs, not an objective universal law of nature. There are many other, equally rational, ways of behaving which do not conform to the laws of market exchange.

The myth of economic man explains the organizing principle of contemporary capitalism, nothing more or less Heilbroner It is no more rational than the myths which drive Hadza, Aborigine, or! Kung society. In industrial societies, however, the myth of economic man justifies the appropriation by a few of the human material culture which has evolved over millennia, and also the appropriation and destruction of the world's physical and biological resources Gowdy Hunter-gatherers were subject to the same foibles as all humans: aggression, jealousy, and avarice.

Likewise, many groups of hunter-gatherers have had a profound impact on the natural environment, as any large species does Flannery , Gamble Such societies, however, were in ecological and social harmony to a degree unmatched in industrial societies. This is informative in itself, since humans have lived as hunter-gatherers for almost all of the time our species has been on this planet. Also informative is the relationship between social egalitarianism and environmental sustainability.

The same features that promoted an egalitarian social structure - sharing, collective decision-making, and a knowledge-based economy - also promoted environmental harmony. Hunter-gatherers did not deliberately cultivate a higher ethical consciousness; their patterns of behavior were embedded in the material characteristics of their economies. With the current population of the Earth approaching 6 billion, we cannot return to a hunting and gathering way of life, barring a catastrophic collapse of the human population.

We can, however, work to incorporate some of the features of hunter-gatherer societies which worked to promote ecological and social harmony. These features include the following:. Social security In immediate-return societies every individual has a share of the social product, regardless of how much he or she has contributed to it.

Social security can also play an important role in the sustainability of modern societies. Lappe and Schurman argue that social insurance in modern China has as much to do with the decline in the birth rate as does the one-child policy Gordon and Suzuki Caldwell points to social security programs and old age pensions as playing a decisive, role in the reduction in population growth in Kerala India and Sri Lanka.

He argues that when life is perceived to be secure, people do not need large families to ensure that they will be taken care of in old age. Environmental sustainability Because immediate-return hunter-gatherers lived, for the most part, off the direct flows from nature, it was immediately apparent when the flow of nature's services was disturbed. Hunter-gatherers have displayed the ability to substitute certain natural resources for many others, but care was taken to maintain the flow of nature's bounty Woodburn Substitution is also one of the basic driving forces behind market economies, but it takes a much different, and virulent, form.

In economic markets, no matter what the resource, a substitute for it will always appear if the price is right. However, since the ultimate measure of market value is monetary, all things are reduced to a single common denominator, money. Substitution is based on monetary values which may ignore essential characteristics not related to immediate market functions.

According to economic criteria, an economy is sustainable, then, if its ability to generate income is maintained, that is, if the monetary value of its means of production is non-decreasing Pearce and Atkinson By this criterion, it is "sustainable," for example, to cut down a rainforest a form of what economists call "natural capital" if the net monetary gain from cutting the rainforest is invested for future generations.

The type of investment does not matter. It could be another forest, an automobile factory, or even a financial investment. Natural capital and manufactured capital are substitutes, and thus everything is convertible, capable of being substituted for something else. This way of looking at the world masks the fact that we are sacrificing for ephemeral economic gains the viability of resources upon which our ultimate existence as a species depends.

Ecological economists have suggested sustainability policies that recognize the essential difference between natural resources and manufactured capital. Goodland, Daly, and El Serafy suggest two broad criteria for what they call "strong sustainability": 1 maintaining the ability of the environment to assimilate the waste of industrial society, and 2 maintaining the stock of natural resources, such as topsoil, clean water, and clean air, necessary for economic activity. Gender equality and sustainability Although the woman-as-gatherer, man-as-hunter distinction is evidently not as clear as once believed see K.

Endicott, this volume , women in many if not most tropical and temperate hunter-gatherer societies supplied the bulk of the food through gathering, although exceptions to this pattern occurred, especially in cultures adapted to higher latitudes where plant foods are relatively scarce.

The dependence on gathering certainly contributed to the gender equality generally present in most hunter-gatherer societies. In many instances in the recent past, the status of women was sharply reduced. The low social status of women in many countries is frequently cited as a major contributor to explosive population growth Jacobson Even in agricultural societies women have played the dominant role in nurturing diversity and sustainability in ecological systems.

Some of the most important ecopolitical movements such as the Chipko movement in the Garhwal Himalaya are led by women Norberg-Hodge ; Shiva Cultural and ecological diversity based on bioregionalism Hunters and gatherers occupied all the area of the earth occupied by modern humans and, for the most part, they did it with sustainable technologies.

Figueira, J. Ueland, and L. The impact of United States recreational fisheries on marine fish populations. Cooke, S. The role of recreational fishing in global fish crises. BioScience 54 9 Contrasting recreational and commercial fishing: searching for common issues to promote unified conservation of fisheries resources and aquatic environments. Biological Conservation 1 Corlett, R.

The impact of hunting on the mammalian fauna of tropical Asian forests. Biotropica 39 3 Mendelson, and J.

The life of an Il Torobo hunter-gatherer

Evidence for post-depletion in a mature sustainability bushmeat market. Journal of Applied Ecology 42 3 Damania, R. Milner-Gulland, and D. A bioeconomic analysis of bushmeat hunting. Davidson, A. Hamilton, A. Boyer, J. Brown, and G. Multiple ecological pathways to extinction in mammals. Daw, T.


Cinner, T. McClanahan, K. Brown, S. Stead, N. Graham, and J. PLoS One 7 2 :e Dayananda, S. Goodale, M. Lee, J. Liu, C. Mammides, B. Pasion, R. Quan, F. Slik, R. Sreekar, K. Tomlinson, and M. Effects of forest fragmentation on nocturnal Asian birds: A case study from Xishuangbanna, China.

Zoological Research 37 3 Dirzo, R. Young, M. Galetti, G. Ceballos, N. Isaac, and B. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. El Bizri, H. Morcatty, J. Lima, and J. Ecology and Society 20 3 Eltringham, S. Can wildlife pay its way? Oryx 28 03 Fa, J. Peres, and J. Bushmeat exploitation in tropical forests: an intercontinental comparison.

Conservation Biology 16 1 Fan, P. Fei, and A. Ecological extinction of the critically endangered northern white-cheeked gibbon Nomascus leucogenys in China. Oryx 48 01 Fox, J. Through the technology lens: the expansion of rubber and its implications in Montane Mainland Southeast Asia. Getz, W. Fortmann, D. Cumming, J. Hilty, R. Martin, M. Murphree, N. Owen-Smith, A. Starfield, and M.

Sustaining natural and human capital: villagers and scientists.


Gibson, C. Williams, and E. Local enforcement and better forests. World Development 33 2 Golden, C. Bonds, J. Brashares, B. Rasolofoniaina, and C. Economic valuation of subsistence harvest of wildlife in Madagascar. Conservation Biology Grumbine, R. Guo, H. Padoch, K. Coffey, A. Chen, and Y. Economic development, land use and biodiversity change in the tropical mountains of Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, Southwest China. Haimoff, E. Yang, S.

He, and N. Conservation of gibbons in Yunnan Province, China. Oryx 21 03 Hammond, J. Yi, T. McLellan, and J. Han, L. Liu, and B. The status and distribution of green peafowl Pavo muticus in Yunnan Province, China.

  • Croissance économique et réduction de la pauvreté au Cameroun (Études africaines) (French Edition)?
  • Junkyard Bones.
  • AS Business Objectives and Strategy Questions?

International Journal of Galliformes Conservation Harris, R. Incentives toward conservation of argali Ovis ammon : a case study of trophy hunting in western China. Oryx 36 4 Initiating a hunting ethic in Lisu villages, Western Yunnan, China. Mountain Research and Development 17 2 Harrison, R. Sreekar, J. Brodie, S. Brook, M. Luskin, H. Rao, B. Scheffers, and N. Impacts of hunting on tropical forests in Southeast Asia. Conservation Biology 30 5 Harrisson, T. The threat to rare animals in Borneo. Oryx 6 2 Hoffmann, M. Hilton-Taylor, A. Angulo, M.

Brooks, S. Butchart, K. Carpenter, J. Chanson, B. Collen, N. Cox, et al. Hwang, K. Face and favor: the Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology Kai, Z. Woan, L. Jie, E. Goodale, K. Kitajima, R. Bagchi, and R. Shifting baselines on a tropical forest frontier: extirpations drive declines in local ecological knowledge. PLoS One 9 1 :e Kram, M. Bedford, M. Durnin, Y. Luo, K. Rokpelnis, B. Roth, N. Smith, Y.

Wang, G. Yu, Q. Yu, and X. Smith, editor. The Nature Conservancy, Beijing, China. Lai, Q. Problems in participatory management of forest resources conflicts [in Chinese]. Journal of Southwest Forestry College 18 2 Lee, T. Sodhi, and D. Environmental Conservation 36 2 Li, L.

Bibliographic Information

Political trust in rural China. Modern China 30 2 Li, P. Enforcing wildlife protection in China: the legislative and political solutions. China Information 21 1 Lindsey, P. Roulet, and S. Economic and conservation significance of the trophy hunting industry in sub-Saharan Africa. Biological Conservation 4 Loveridge, A. Reynolds, and E. Does sport hunting benefit conservation? Pages in D. Macdonald and K. Service, editors. Key topics in conservation biology 1. Blackwell, Oxford, UK. Luo, A. Investigation on the current status of distribution and population of the green peafowl in Xishuangbanna [in Chinese].

Chinese Journal of Ecology 17 5 , MacKinnon, J. Review of the protected areas system in the Indo-Malayan realm. Working paper. MacMillan, D. Factors influencing the illegal harvest of wildlife by trapping and snaring among the Katu ethnic group in Vietnam. Oryx 48 2 Maxwell, S. Fuller, T. Brooks, and J. Biodiversity: the ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers. Nature Milner-Gulland, E. Wild meat: the bigger picture. Morsello, C. Beltreschi, N. Van Vliet, C. Adams, T.

hunter-gatherer | Definition, Societies, & Facts |

Schor, M. Quiceno-Mesa, and D. Cultural attitudes are stronger predictors of bushmeat consumption and preference than economic factors among urban Amazonians from Brazil and Colombia. Ecology and Society 20 4 Muallil, R. Geronimo, D. Cleland, R. Cabral, M. Doctor, A. Cruz-Trinidad, and P. Willingness to exit the artisanal fishery as a response to scenarios of declining catch or increasing monetary incentives. Fisheries Research 1 Myers, N.

Mittermeier, C. Mittermeier, G. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Bunnefeld, L.

Naiman, and E. A novel approach to assessing the prevalence and drivers of illegal bushmeat hunting in the Serengeti. Conservation Biology 27 6 Oleson, K. Barnes, L. Brander, T. Oliver, I. Van Beek, B. Zafindrasilivonona, and P. Cultural bequest values for ecosystem service flows among indigenous fishers: a discrete choice experiment validated with mixed methods. Ecological Economics Ostrom, E. Burger, C. Field, R. Norgaard, and D. Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Lam, and M. The performance of self-governing irrigation systems in Nepal. Human Systems Management 13 3 Pauly, D.

Christensen, J. Dalsgaard, R. Froese, and F. Torres, Jr. Fishing down marine food webs. Peres, C. Synergistic effects of subsistence hunting and habitat fragmentation on Amazonian forest vertebrates. Conservation Biology 15 6 Perreault, T. Changing places: transnational networks, ethnic politics, and community development in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Political Geography 22 1 Rao, M. Htun, T. Zaw, and T. Hunting, livelihoods and declining wildlife in the Hponkanrazi wildlife sanctuary, North Myanmar.

Environmental Management 46 2 Myint, T. Zaw, and S. Hunting patterns in tropical forests adjoining the Hkakaborazi National Park, north Myanmar. Oryx 39 3 Rosser, A. Mainka Overexploitation and species extinctions. Santiapillai, C. Zhu, D. Hua, and S. Distribution of elephant in Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture. Gajah Scheffers, B. Corlett, A. Diesmos, and W. Local demand drives a bushmeat industry in a Philippine forest preserve. Tropical Conservation Science 5 2 Sharma, C. Chinese endangered species at the brink of extinction: a critical look at the current law and policy in China.

Animal Law Shi, T. Comparative Politics 33 4 Shilai, M. Lianxian, L. Daoying, J. Weizhi, and R. Faunal resources of the Gaoligongshan region of Yunnan, China: diverse and threatened. Environmental Conservation 22 03 Cardenas, and J. The relation between income and hunting in tropical forests: an economic experiment in the field. Ecology and Society 11 1 Sodhi, N. Posa, T. Lee, D. Bickford, L. Koh, and B. The state and conservation of Southeast Asian biodiversity.

Biodiversity and Conservation 19 2 St John, F. Edwards-Jones, and J. Conservation and human behaviour: lessons from social psychology. Wildlife Research 37 8 Keane, and E. Effective conservation depends upon understanding human behaviour. Willis, editors. Key topics in conservation biology 2. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK. Steinmetz, R. Chutipong, N.

Seuaturien, E. Chirngsaard, and M. Population recovery patterns of Southeast Asian ungulates after poaching. Srirattanaporn, J. Mor-Tip, and N. Can community outreach alleviate poaching pressure and recover wildlife in South-East Asian protected areas? Journal of Applied Ecology 51 6 Tisdell, C. Reconciling economic development, nature conservation and local communities: strategies for biodiversity conservation in Xishuangbanna, China. Environmentalist 16 3 Van Vliet, N. Hunting for livelihood in North East Gabon: patterns, evolution and sustainability.

Ecology and Society 13 2 Velho, N. Oryx 47 03 Wang, M. Webber, B. Finlayson, and J. Rural industries and water pollution in China. Journal of Environmental Management 86 4 Wang, Z. Forest landscape and bird diversity in mountain region, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan. Chinese Geographical Science Wilcove, D. Giam, D. Edwards, B. Fisher, and L. Wilkie, D. Bennett, C. Peres, and A. The empty forest revisited. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1 Xu, J.

The political, social, and ecological transformation of a landscape: the case of rubber in Xishuangbanna, China. Mountain Research and Development 26 3 Vogler, Y. Fu, P. Zhang, L. Yang, Q. Jie, and S. Land-use and land-cover change and farmer vulnerability in Xishuangbanna prefecture in southwestern China.